Weekly musings, 7/22/17: confidence and sharing

I posted a blog recently, quietly, with little attention. Few people read it, which fortunately isn’t why I write. A business associate, whom I have a lot of respect for, messaged me after reading it, encouraging me to be more visible. “You seem almost shy about it,” he wrote.

I do challenging physical skills almost daily. I think of myself as physically competent, resilient in many ways. However, the hardest thing I do on a regular basis is hit “publish.” I am never fully happy with anything I create. Whenever I re-read a blog or re-listen to a class I have crafted, I find myself critiquing my words. “I should have said it this way,” “it would have read better if I gave it more context,” “I should have used less words…” 

If I waited until my work was perfect to share it, I wouldn’t share anything. And maybe that would be okay. The fitness industry is riddled with noise, people asserting their opinions about why specific exercises are “the best,” and what people should do to become more fit. I am just one more voice in the sea of “experts,” and I often find myself confused about where I fit. I believe in strength and mobility; I also believe in the mind/body connection and the power of breath. I read psychology and motor control textbooks, but appreciate a good paper on biomechanics and tendinopathy. Trauma fascinates me; so does the shoulder. I think the fitness industry doesn’t spend enough time teaching people how to fully be in their body, but many coaches have better progressions to more advanced exercises than I do. 

So I write about these things and create content around these things, the ones that fascinate me and help me be a better teacher and coach. I write for me, so I can dive a little more heavily into the research; I hit “post” because I spend so much time thinking about things and trying to understand that I feel like others shouldn’t have to work so hard. If I help one person see something a little bit differently, I have saved him time and maybe made a small difference in his life. To me, this is valuable. 

Steven Pressfield writes in “The War of Art,” A professional schools herself to stand apart from her performance, even as she gives herself to it heart and soul. The Bhagavad Gita tells us we have a right only to our labor, not to the fruits of our labor. All the warrior can give is his life; all the athlete can do is leave everything on the field.” When you create something, anything, you have a choice- either share it or keep it for yourself. My grandmother used to sketch, pencil drawings. When she died, I felt a sadness that her ability to perceive the world around her and interpret it on paper was kept hidden from all of us. She did not share her work, save for the occasional cartoon when we were children. Perhaps she was afraid it wasn’t good enough to share. But that’s the thing. It’s never good enough, and there will always be people that judge harshly. 

If you are creating for someone else, you are destined to feel inadequate. You will never feel like you have a right to share your work. You will find yourself comparing your creations to others, paralyzed by their thoughts and judgments. 

If you create for you, even though your work will never live up to your standards, it makes the opinions of others an afterthought. Rather than feel lesser because of a critique, if it’s a critique you haven’t already given yourself, you are less defensive and more open to how your work can be made better. Through practice and consistency, you will improve, but it will never be perfect. You don’t hit “post” because of the amount of likes you might get, but because you are sharing your imperfect creation. If your creation taught you something and made you better in some way, it is worth sharing.

And so I will continue to quietly hit post, knowing that if one person learns something from my words, it is enough.

Weekly musings, 7/16/17: Experience

This funny thing happens when you are “the teacher,” or “the trainer.” Your clients assume you know all. They come to you for advice, they assume you understand how the body works, and they trust your knowledge. They are, after all, paying you for your expertise.

As teachers, we are only as good as the sum of our experiences and our knowledge. Experience can’t be bought. Watching people move, observing what cues work, and noticing how people respond to specific exercises comes from doing, from being the teacher or trainer. 

However, if we rely only on experience and we don’t value learning from others in our field, we get stuck. Listening to others explain things and seeing how they put things together opens doors to new vantage points. It keeps our brains engaged with the material of human movement.

It also keeps our brains involved with our bodies. If we aren’t continually playing with movement, seeing what happens when we do x, y, and z, the connection with our subject lessens. 

Whatever field you are in, taking the time to listen to what other experts have to say is invaluable. Interacting with the material on a deeper level, through coaching or a long term course, can have a profound impact on how you experience what you are teaching. If you don’t value what you do enough to spend money on it, how can you expect others to do the same?

Word minimalism and cueing

I spend a lot of time thinking about cueing. More specifically, I spend a lot of time figuring out how to give people the minimal amount of instructions to get them to fully experience a movement in a way that feels strong and easeful. 

This is opposite how I used to teach. So many words would fly out of my mouth as I struggled to tap into what worked for someone that I was often exhausted at the end of the day and tired of the sound of my voice.

I am still tired of the sound of my voice at the end of the day, but I have learned how to be a more effective communicator. (At least, I think I have. I may, however, suffer from personal bias). Below are a few thoughts regarding how to improve a person’s overall movement experience. 

Learning styles:
But first, I think it’s worthwhile to say a quick word about learning style. When I was in graduate school, my motor control teacher told us there was no foundation for the idea of kinesthetic/visual/auditory learners. Sure enough, evidence shows the classification of learning styles is a myth, with studies regularly showing people learn from all three styles of teaching in an education setting (1).

I struggled with this for a long time. Working with different people, it seemed people were more likely to absorb information if it was given to them in a specific way. Some clients seemed to respond to me demonstrating better than me explaining, while others did well if I gave them a tactile cue.

After sitting with this idea for a while and reading a lot about motor control, I began to realize it wasn’t necessarily the format in which the material was presented that mattered; rather, it was whether the person (or people, if it’s a class setting), had a frame of reference for what I was saying.

Additionally, we were designed to receive information from our visual world, auditory world, and proprioceptive world during movement (2). We process all of this information at once as try to effectively complete a specific task. It stands to reason that whatever additional feedback is given from an outside source should be done in a way that isn’t overwhelming to the recipient and is appropriate for the task at hand. 

For instance, if I ask someone to move his shoulder blade a specific way and the person doesn’t know where the shoulder blade is or how it functions, this cue is useless. If I touch the shoulder blade or demonstrate the exercise, the person has a higher chance of “getting it” because he either feels the body part I am talking about or he has watched me move a specific area so his mirror neurons can do their thing and mimic the movement. It’s not that he’s a visual or kinesthetic learner; he just didn’t know what I was talking about because he was out of touch with that specific part of his body. 

Once I understood this, I began to see more clearly which form of communication would work best for the client, based on the person’s body awareness, pain patterns, and exercise history. Choosing became more situationally dependent, rather than based on the idea the person learned best in a particular way.

Self bodywork:
In the exercise science world, we love to attribute a variety of movement “dysfunctions” to hypertonicity of a muscle. A muscle is considered hypertonic when it is contracted while in a passively stretched state (3). Basically, if the muscle feels hard to the touch when the person is relaxed, the muscle would be considered hypertonic.

In years past, the coach or teacher’s solution probably involved a long, cylindrical apparatus or a hard ball (or a soft ball) and rolling, or smashing, or melting, or maybe even Super D’s version: https://youtu.be/kQM5-Uwui0o.

There was eventually a backlash against all of this self body work that was taking up half of people’s workout sessions, with people arguing that moving (for most people) was more important than “releasing.”

While foam rolling and its cousins probably don’t do what we originally thought (chances are slim fascia is being re-modelled and adhesions are breaking up while we impose discomfort to ourselves), it can be a handy way to increase our overall awareness of a body part. It also temporarily increases range of motion, improving proprioception (4). 

Let’s say I am trying to teach someone to press his feet into the floor. (This is much harder than it sounds. It’s almost like modern day footwear and ground surfaces enable us to levitate, barely grazing the surface of the earth ). I can cue this individual to press his foot into the ground a variety of ways: like he’s pressing a nail into the floor, as though he were spreading his foot like a glove, etc., etc. There is a small chance one of these suggestions might work, but more than likely, this approach will find me (and the client), frustrated because he isn’t able to “get” what I am asking him to do. Instead, a much easier (and faster) method would be to have him roll the bottom of his foot on a golf ball or press various parts of his forefoot into a small, folded towel (the same can be done with the heel). Now, when I say press into the ground he will actually understand what I mean and be able to feel his foot pressing into the ground. Why does this work?

When pressure is applied to the skin, the stretch receptors located in the skin send information up to the brain via the afferent nervous system. This information, along with information from the muscle spindles and the joint receptors, creates an image in the brain about how joint and its associated limb are positioned in space (5). When he places his foot on the golf ball, he feels the pressure of the skin on the bottom of his foot change. This acts as a reminder that his foot consists of tissue that is pressing against the golf ball. The brain map of his foot becomes a little less fuzzy as his somatosensory cortex begins to color in the lines of exactly what his foot looks like. 

I am not suggesting everyone needs to spend all of their time rolling out their body before they start moving; however, if you are going to work on a specific area and the person struggles with sensing that area, 2-4 minutes of self myofascial release or directed tactile awareness drills can go a long way.

The stuck shoulder blades (and other confused body parts):
As movement teachers, we love to tell clients what they should do. “Relax your shoulder blades,” we say, anticipating they understand a) what their shoulder blades are and b) how to relax them.

Neither of these statements is guaranteed. In fact, chances are pretty good the person you are working with that has her shoulders up by her ears isn’t quite sure what her shoulder blades do and has no idea what it means to relax them. 

This leads to mild irritation and a little bit of panic (“why isn’t she doing what I asked? I can’t be more clear. I suck at my job,” you might find yourself thinking. The poor client is wondering, “why is her voice getting more pitched? I moved my arm. Isn’t that what she wants me to do?”). 

There are actually a couple of easy tricks to improve the client’s ability to understand what you are asking without using very many words, otherwise known as the art of word minimalism. (Totally made that up. But minimalism is a thing, and I sometimes think word minimalism should be a thing. As my husband say, “there is great power in silence”).

Trick #1: let the person do what he wants to do (but exaggerate it)
I originally learned this when I began studying Feldenkrais. The lessons routinely take the person into the position he habitually goes. Ortho-bionomy does the same thing, but it’s done in  a manual therapy setting, with the therapist taking you into the position. Why does this work?

Let’s pretend you ask the hypothetical person above to bring her shoulder blades up by her ears. Since they are already elevated, they won’t have far to go. It gives the nervous system a chance to recognize the habituated pattern in a safe environment. Taking the person further into the position will theoretically make it easier for the person to find alternative movement strategies (6).

When people don’t realize they are tensing a muscle, they aren’t going to consciously be able to relax it. Imagine you are teaching someone how to do a single leg deadlift without weight. When the person hinges forward, his left index finger juts out, as though he were going to keep himself up with just the activity in that finger. You have asked him to shake his hands out and relax his fingers, all to no avail. As soon as the movement starts, so does his left index finger.

After observing a set, let’s say you have that same individual sit down and perform a few hand exercises. It doesn’t really matter what they are, as long as they address the fingers both together and individually, contracting and relaxing the hand musculature. What do you think happens when you have the person do his second set of single leg deadlifts?

Nine times out of ten, the excessive hand movement will go away without you saying a word. This, in my opinion, is extremely powerful. By allowing the muscles that wanted to contract to contract and relax through isolated exercise, the nervous system was able to figure out an alternative way to do things.

You could also have him purposefully tighten his hands while performing the single leg deadlift. Once he has performed one set while tightening his hands, have him try a set without his hands tense. Now that he understands what “tense” is, it will make it easier for him to understand what it means to be “not tense.” You have given him a context for understanding your words. 

Trick #2: Shift the perspective
Let’s say trick #1 doesn’t work. The person is still overusing his left index finger and left hand while balancing during the single leg deadlift. What now?

Shift the perspective. This is more standard neuromuscular training. Maybe you add in a bit of work on the feet and ankle, or perhaps you work on the lateral hip or abs. 

This can look a number of ways, but sometimes what I will do is create a little mini awareness/isolation circuit that might look something like this:
Roll bottom of foot with golf ball
Dynamically mobilize top of the foot in standing
Perform 4 supine partial rolls each side, focusing on breath
Perform external hip rotation with feet on wall, 4 per side with isometric hold on last one (focus on breath) (A video of this short circuit can be found here: https://vimeo.com/225732522)

When you return to the single deadlift exercise, the person is going to feel connected to his feet and his center. Chances are high his fingers will be quiet. 

Again, the goal is to minimize the amount of words used and let the person experience the change. If you ask the person how the deadlift feels and he says, “different,” even if he is unable to articulate how it’s different, the ability to acknowledge a shift increases the chance he will be able to repeat the movement in this new way.

Trick #3: “Can you feel…”
Finally, the third trick Is bringing awareness to the person’s habit. Instead of cueing the person to not do something, I simply ask the person if he can feel that he is doing a particular action.

In the case of the person using his index finger to help with his balance, I might ask, “can you feel what your left index finger is doing right now?” This changes the person’s focus from trying to balance to a completely different (though active), body part. 

This works really well for individuals that habitually tighten a specific area when they are responding to a new or stressful situation. For people that clench their jaw or narrow their gaze, asking what their jaw is doing or how they are using their eyes is often the cue they need to snap them out of their habit. When I reference things like this regularly throughout the session, it isn’t unusual for the person to come in a week later holding himself in a completing different way. When I ask what he’s been doing, the response is usually, “I have been thinking about how often I clench my jaw throughout the day. Every time I find myself clenching my jaw, I try and relax it.”

Again, instead of telling the person what NOT to do, I give the individual an opportunity to recognize his tendency and make a conscious decision to change it. This is far more powerful than me overusing my words.

References:

  1. Pashler, H., McDaniel, Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R., (2008). Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 106-116.
  2. Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P., (2013). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletic & Review, 20(1), 21-53.
  3. Masi, A.T., Kamat, S., Gajdosik, R., Ahmad, N., & Aldag, J.C., (2015). Muscular hypertonicity: a suspected contributor to rheumatological manifestations observed in ambulatory practice. European Journal of Rheumatology, 2(2).
  4. Kelly, S., & Beardsley, C., (2016). Specific and cross-over effects of foam rolling on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 11(4).
  5. Longo, M.R., (2017). Expansion of perceptual body maps near - but not across - the wrist. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(111).
  6. Hiller, S., & Worley, A., (2015). The effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: a systematic review of the evidence. Evidence - Based Complimentary and Alternative Medicine. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ecam/2015/752160/

Weekly musings, 7/9/17: soreness and public speaking

When was the last time you were sore? Really, uncomfortably sore? Unless you recently started a workout program that is in some way different than your normal movements, it’s probably been a while. 

We tend to (logically) avoid discomfort. If you haven’t moved for a long time, some soreness is to be expected when you begin an exercise program because more movement is greater than no movement. For those of us that exercise regularly, soreness is sometimes a bit of a shock, as though our current exercise routine should make us impervious to soreness that results from a new stimulus. 

The soreness that shows up a few hours after exercise and lasts up to 72 hours is delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Scientists believe it is likely caused by the muscle cell damage that follows a bout of eccentric exercise. The body’s response includes soreness, inflammation, and a reduction in muscular force production while the cellular healing response moves in to make the tissue stronger, more resilient. Basically, a little bit of discomfort occurs so that next time you do that exercise, you are more able to tolerate it.*

When I first started public speaking during workshops and lectures, I would get extremely nervous, uncomfortable with how many people were going to be looking at me. I would gut through it, reminding myself to slow down, look at the audience, and keep going. The aftermath was draining. I was never pleased with my performance, and I would promise myself that next time would be better.

Slowly, as I continued to do it, I became more comfortable. The butterflies that used to sit in the pit of my stomach ceased. I began to connect with the audience better as I became more confident and practiced. The discomfort that used to occur eventually gave way to a sense of strength. 

Being a little bit uncomfortable sometimes is okay. Repeating the uncomfortable situation, whether it’s in the form of exercise or life, is even better because eventually, it does get easier and you get stronger.

“According to most studies, people's number one fear is public speaking. Number two is death. Death is number two. Does that sound right? This means to the average person, if you go to a funeral, you're better off in the casket than doing the eulogy.” ~Jerry Seinfeld

*A good, basic read on DOMS: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-does-lactic-acid-buil/
**For those of you that like research, this was a really interesting study on force production following an eccentric bout of exercise: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262141/

Weekly musings, 7/2/17: What if…

What if…
Exercises and movements no longer had labels associated with them regarding whether they were “bad” or “good?”
Instead of telling people, “lifting heavy things without proper form is bad for you,” we said, “lifting things when you are tired and not paying attention might not be the best idea?”
The recommendations for exercise were no longer, “30 minutes of moderate physical activity most days of the week,” and were instead, “move a little bit more than you did yesterday?”
We stopped telling people their current lifestyle is killing them and instead encouraged everyone to get up and down off of the floor more?
We threw out numbers (the ones on the scale, the amount of time/weight/HR percentage needed for optimal exercise intensity), and instead asked people to pay attention to how their body feels?

 

Weekly musings, 6/25/17: on feeling

Weekly musings, 6/25/17: on feeling
I was chatting with a client of mine recently. She is a therapist that specializes in trauma and PTSD. 

One of her patients came in last week and was telling her about leg sensations he has had for years. He couldn’t quite articulate what he experienced with his legs, other than the fact they didn’t feel like they belonged to him. 

After asking a few questions, his therapist had him come into a wall sit position. This is a position I have been using with her to improve proprioceptive awareness of the pelvis in relation to the mid back. 

Once he finished a few breaths, he sat down. “How do you feel?” she asked.

“Aware of my legs,” he replied.

“Is this a good thing or a bad thing?”

“It’s amazing. I feel like they belong to me; I have a sense of control that I didn’t have before.”

One of the great values of exercise is it puts you in touch with your body. The sensations that arise during exercise remind of us that different areas support us. Tapping into these sensations and different areas can have a deeper impact than just on a person’s physical well-being.

*If you are interested in exploring the mind/body connection as it relates to trauma, this article touches upon the topic: https://www.brainpickings.org/2016/06/20/the-body-keeps-the-score-van-der-kolk/

Weekly musings, 6/18/17: Efficiency

Weekly musings, 6/18/17: Efficiency
In the book, “Biophysical Foundations of Human Movement,” the authors write, “the human body is at most 25% efficient.” This refers to mechanical efficiency, or the amount of energy that is required to accomplish a specific task.

What struck me about this is how inefficient we actually are. Perhaps the reason we lack efficiency is because there are many ways for us to perform any given movement. Our central nervous system is constantly working to figure out what the best strategy is, depending on the environment and our current physical state. 

Anyone that teaches movement knows what a person skilled in a motor task looks like versus one that is unskilled. For those that lack efficiency, our job as coaches and trainers is to coax a greater sense of ease out of the movement. Understanding that we are only 25% efficient means there is always a different avenue to explore, to see if it’s possible to tap into a strategy that opens a slightly different path towards less resistance, knowing maximal efficiency will always be slightly out of reach.

Weekly musings, 6/11/17: the purpose of function

Weekly musings, 6/11/17: the purpose of function
Last Saturday, a man was pushed on to subway tracks at a station in New York City. A professional ballet dancer recovering from a herniated disc witnessed the entire thing. When no one came forward to help, he leapt down on to the tracks, lifted the man up, and, while carrying the unconscious man, used the strength of his leg to perform a deep step up back up on to the platform.* A movie couldn’t have scripted the scene much better,

There is a lot of debate about what it means for fitness to be functional. As long as there is a cross over benefit to movements in real life, it stands to reason the fitness you acquire in the gym has a functional purpose. 

Ballet requires the ability to land from jumps with control and from high depths. A large degree of hip mobility is necessary to achieve the artistic expression required to dance at the professional level. Male dancers regularly lift their partners in a variety of ways. (Lifting bodies, I am told, is much different than lifting weights). The ballet dancer’s training translated into a real life situation in a powerful way.

Getting strong improves self confidence. It opens doors to exploring the natural environment more fully. Trusting your legs to lift you up a mountain, for instance, makes climbing up the mountain a lot more enjoyable. Whatever you do in the gym that involves lifting weighted objects will give you strength that translates into real world function. However, if you truly want your strength to be functional, practice moving in different contexts, using your body in varied ways. (And maybe add a bit of jumping in once in a while because jumping, like other movement skills, gets better with practice).

*To read the full article, check it out here: https://nyti.ms/2sFs12E
**If you want to witness the athleticism of ballet in action, I find this one inspiring: https://youtu.be/RJBZWt8lQXk

Weekly musings, 6/4/17: Distance running


If you follow distance running, you are probably familiar with the fact the Kenyan athletes are a powerhouse. Athletes from the Kalenjin tribe have won three times more Olympic medals in distance running than any other nation.* This is an impressive feat for anyone, and bit incredible when you consider this small village only makes up 1/2000 of the world’s population.

We believe there are a lot of factors that allow athletes to excel. In the US, we have coaches and trainers. We hire nutritionists to manage our micro and macronutrients, and we have devised a number of techniques to ensure we recover in the most efficient way possible. Over the last three decades, researchers have tried to pinpoint what allows the Kalenjin tribe to excel in the world of running. Possible theories that have fallen flat include:

  • They live and train at high altitude, influencing oxygen capacity. No difference in maximal oxygen uptake was found between elite Kenyan runners and elite Scandinavian runners.
  • Their nutrition is somehow superior. It turns out their diet is actually lacking adequate vitamins and minerals. They also go into a negative energy balance during intense training cycles, which means they lose weight. (A recent Runner’s World magazine cover promised to teach readers how to not gain weight during training season. I guess we have the opposite problem in the west).
  • Genetics. No association between genetic makeup and performance has been found. 

So what allows these runners to excel? Maybe it’s partially due to the exposure they get to running long distances at an early age. Between the ages of 6-14, the way they get to school is by running and walking 5-13 KM each day. They build a solid base during a time when their tissues are adaptable, but it’s not through formal training or coaching. No one tells them how to be more efficient or that they should change their running stride to match a certain aesthetic or idea of what is “right.” They just run and walk, finding the most economical means of getting from point a to point b. Maybe one of the reasons they become running phenoms is because their movements aren’t micromanaged at a young age? Or maybe the fact that there is no outcome associated with the early years of running in these athletes contributes to a different mindset around running? Whatever it is (and I’m sure the “it” is a lot of things), can’t be copied or packaged into the perfect training plan. But maybe we can learn something from the lack of early coaching and giving children the opportunity to learn from self practice. 

*Abstract, with link to full text here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24149957

Weekly musings, 5/28/17: Clearing up why and learning

Weekly musings, 5/28/17: Clearing up why and learning
Over the weekend, I hung out at the park with my 4 year-old nephew. We played, with the loose rules of the game appearing to be I did what he did, unless he put me in time out or gave me alternative directions (for the record, I seemed to spend a fair amount of time in time out). When he would get stuck on a particular task, he would have me do it. He would watch how I moved, and then mimic me, trying to figure out how to move his limbs in the same configuration.

Children have an innate curiosity about how their bodies move and how they can manipulate their shapes. Adults lose this curiosity, largely because we don’t have the flexibility and control to move our bodies in the ways we do when we are children. This loss of freedom doesn’t have to be a foregone conclusion. I will never be as flexible as my nephew because of fully developed growth plates and muscle mass, but I can still move spontaneously in a variety of ways. I have options because I do the work in and out of the gym to develop those options. 

One of the most challenging parts of training is figuring out what people’s goals actually are and if they have the motivation to do the work it takes to meet those goals. Our lives don’t require much activity; we have to search for ways to include varied activities in our everyday lives. For me, this means I can play with my nephew at the park and not worry about getting injured. For others, it might mean maintaining the ability to get up and down from the floor. It’s not about everyone having the same goals, but it is important to be clear what your goals are.

*In this excellent, short blog post from Jules Mitchell, she eloquently describes what it’s like to write publicly about movement. I write to work out my thoughts and deepen my understanding of what I observe. They are a snapshot, freezing my thoughts in a moment of time. As I continue to learn and grow as a practitioner, my opinions change, but the old posts remain. They represent growth and the never ending process of learning. Read her blog here: http://www.julesmitchell.com/question-everything/

Weekly musings, 5/21/17: sleeping when tired


Weekly musings, 5/21/17
In the book, “Wild Nights: How Taming Sleep Created Our Restless World,” Benjamin Reiss writes, “A significant part of the contemporary obsession with sleep is that we’re somehow doing it wrong.” 

This idea that there is a “wrong” way and a “right” way to sleep is in line with how the rest of the health and wellness disciplines are treated. Eating a specific way will kill you; eating the right way will cure cancer. Exercising the right way will extend your life, exercising the wrong way will increase risk of heart disease. (What constitutes the “right” way to eat and exercise, as far as I can tell, depends on how you manipulate the research). 

I love science. I love the idea that questions can be answered in a systematic, conclusive way. The problem, of course, is that science has flaws and researchers have biases.* When it comes to human nature, black and white statements regarding how much sleep we should get, how much exercise we should, and what we should be eating can be anxiety provoking. Perhaps it also makes it harder than it needs to be. What if we ate whole foods when we were hungry, slept when we were tired, and moved regularly, in a varied way throughout the day? Would we feel better and have more energy? Unfortunately, it goes against societal norms to take naps when we feel sleepy, or to get up and down from the floor regularly at work. But maybe it really could be that simple.

*This is a long, but interesting read on this topic: http://redux.slate.com/cover-stories/2017/05/daryl-bem-proved-esp-is-real-showed-science-is-broken.html

Weekly musings, 5/14/17: the importance of fun

People occasionally ask me why we are doing a specific exercise.

It’s a valid question. They are spending their money with me to ensure I design a safe and effective exercise program that keeps them strong and fit. They are absolutely allowed to ask why.

Depending on the exercise, my answers can be anything from, “because it’s a precursor of a more challenging exercise,” or “because movement x is challenging for you so I am breaking it down even further,” to, “because it’s fun.” (Fun involves things like working on hand eye coordination with a ball or crawling around in strange ways on the floor).

Somewhere along the line, “exercise” became synonymous with “chore.” It conjures up images of work and drudgery, completely devoid of any enjoyment. We focus on “activating” certain muscles and moving in a specific pattern. However, back before we became adults, playing tag, hopscotch, and creating physical games was a fun way to pass the time, all while using our bodies in a varied way. 

Adding things you enjoy into your exercise regime make life more interesting and keep you more mentally engaged. It breaks up the monotony of lifting ways and improves your physical confidence. Plus, we could all use a little more fun in our lives.

*An essay on handstands: https://nyti.ms/2pKR3zf

Weekly musings, 5/7/17: Discomfort


“We live in a world where we don’t get scars. We get paper cuts.” ~Morgan Spurlock

The documentary, “Rise of the Sufferfests,”* chronicles the boom of obstacle course racing (OCR). In it, filmmaker and journalist Scott Keneally suggests people are spending hundreds of dollars to be seriously uncomfortable because we miss the sense of accomplishment that goes along with physical challenge. Our lives are filled with all of the comforts we could ever want, he argues. We never have to be cold, most of us don’t ever have to work physically hard; we don’t even have to get up to adjust the settings of the lights anymore. All of these conveniences are creating a void between us and the physical world.

There is something to be said for a physical challenge.** Hiking a big hill, scrambling over rocks, or climbing a tree all create a connection between us and our external environment. Our daily lives don’t require this, and as time marches on, many of us continue to move further and further away from the ability to rekindle that connection. We lose flexibility and strength and we go to gyms instead of trails. 

I don’t necessarily think getting electrocuted or tempting hyperthermia is necessary to rekindle this connection. I do, however, think there is power in playing outside and physically challenging yourself on a regular basis. I strongly believe what people do in the gym should support the ability to spontaneously react to their external environment when an opportunity presents itself. As Laird Hamilton said, “You can never have too much fun. You just need to be in really good shape to do it.”

*The documentary, “Rise of the Sufferfests,” is available to rent online. 
Catherine Cowey wrote a guest blog on my site about the importance of daily discomfort. Check it out here: http://www.bewellpt.com/blog/2017/4/27/resiliency-training-daily-discomfort-vitamin

Improve flexibility, mobility, and learn how to react to the physical environment June 2-4 at the Nature and Movement Retreat in Napa Valley: http://www.bewellpt.com/events/2016/9/11/mind-body-nature-a-two-day-movement-retreat

Weekly musings, 4/30/17: the power of different

Weekly musings, 4/30/17
In the book, “The Power of Different,” Gail Saltz* discusses the power of exercise on depression. “What is perhaps most fascinating is that not only can exercise be as effective as antidepressant medication, but its effects are longer lasting,” she writes.

Perhaps more important than the physical benefits of getting stronger and feeling more capable, are the benefits of exercise on mood. Exercise increases self-esteem and cardiovascular exercise in particular releases neurotransmitters associated with mood regulation. 

If you only focus on the physical aspects of exercise, you are missing what could arguably be considered the most powerful reason to get moving. Stabilizing your mood positively impacts not just you, but the people around you. Depression afflicts 6.7% of Americans in a given year, and anxiety affects 18% of adults annually.** A regular exercise routine can be extremely beneficial and should be part of a multi-faceted approach for individuals struggling with mood disorders.

*”The Power of Different” is a great survey of mood disorders. There were three sections where I found myself thinking, “I can relate to that.” This is sort of like reading a medical textbook and self diagnosing yourself with every disease you read about.
**Data can be found here: https://www.adaa.org/about-adaa/press-room/facts-statistics
***There are still spots available in the nature and movement retreat, June 2-4 in Napa Valley. To register: http://www.bewellpt.com/events/2016/9/11/mind-body-nature-a-two-day-movement-retreat